https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHTsYvbppMw
Transcript:
0:00
In 1480, every painter in Italy knew how to make a dead Christ beautiful. You gave him soft light. You arranged the0:08
8 seconds
limbs with dignity. You surrounded him with weeping figures who pressed close,0:12
12 seconds
who made death look like something love could soften. You gave the viewer a way in and a way out. Mantenna gave you neither. The body in this painting is0:21
21 seconds
gray, cold. The limbs have stiffened the way a body actually stiffens after death. not peacefully but with a rigidity that looks almost aggressive as0:30
30 seconds
though the flesh itself is resisting what happened to it. The skin has the texture of stone. The wounds on the hands and feet are not softened or0:37
37 seconds
idealized. Art historians have described their painted texture as resembling torn paper which is exactly right and exactly0:45
45 seconds
the problem because you cannot look at them without feeling something close to physical discomfort. This is the lamentation of Christ painted by Andrea0:54
54 seconds
Mantenna around 1480 and it is one of the most technically astonishing and emotionally brutal paintings in western1:01
1 minute, 1 second
art. You are placed at the feet that is not a casual compositional choice. The perspective pulls you down to the level of the stone slab puts you at the end of1:10
1 minute, 10 seconds
the body and holds you there. And the first thing you see, the thing that fills the bottom of the frame and refuses to move are the feet, pale,1:20
1 minute, 20 seconds
enormous, the nail wounds open and dark,1:23
1 minute, 23 seconds
pointing directly at you. Every other painter of this subject put the viewer beside the body at a respectful1:30
1 minute, 30 seconds
distance. As a witness, Manten put you at the feet. There is a difference between witnessing grief and being made1:37
1 minute, 37 seconds
to kneel inside it. Now most people standing in front of this painting never look past the feet which is exactly what1:46
1 minute, 46 seconds
Montana intended because the feet are a trap while you are staring at them. The painting is quietly doing something else1:53
1 minute, 53 seconds
entirely. Look at the back right corner of the canvas half swallowed by shadow almost invisible sits a small jar. That2:01
2 minutes, 1 second
jar belongs to Mary Magdalene one of the central figures in the story of Christ's death and resurrection. She was,2:08
2 minutes, 8 seconds
according to the Gospels, the woman who anointed Christ's feet with expensive perfumed oil and was the first person to2:15
2 minutes, 15 seconds
encounter him after he rose from the dead. In Renaissance painting, she was always identified by one object, that jar of ointment. Every painter used it2:24
2 minutes, 24 seconds
as her signature, the single detail that told you she was present. Here,2:29
2 minutes, 29 seconds
Montenena has pushed it so deep into the corner, so far into the shadow that most viewers never find it. Which means most2:37
2 minutes, 37 seconds
viewers also never realize she is in this painting at all. She is there slightly hidden behind the Virgin Mary and St. John. Her face, a third grief2:46
2 minutes, 46 seconds
among the mourers on the left, but only if you look for the jar. And Manten made the jar almost impossible to find. That2:53
2 minutes, 53 seconds
is deliberate. This entire painting is built on the principle of concealment. Look at Christ's head. There is a halo.3:01
3 minutes, 1 second
You will almost certainly miss it on first viewing. In Renaissance painting, a halo was unmistakable by design.3:08
3 minutes, 8 seconds
Golden, prominent, a declaration of divinity that announced itself the moment you entered the room. Mantenna's halo is a faint shimmer, barely3:16
3 minutes, 16 seconds
distinguishable from the light behind the skull. Not absent, suppressed.3:20
3 minutes, 20 seconds
Because the argument this painting is making is about the body, not the divinity. It is making the case quietly,3:27
3 minutes, 27 seconds
insistently through every compositional choice that what is lying on that stone slab is a fully completely human body.3:34
3 minutes, 34 seconds
That God in this moment looks exactly like a dead man. The halo is still there because Mantenna was not denying the3:41
3 minutes, 41 seconds
theology. He was just refusing to let it rescue you from the reality of what you were looking at. The stone slab itself is not a neutral surface. It has a name,3:50
3 minutes, 50 seconds
the stone of uncction, the stone of anointing. In Christian tradition, it refers to the specific slab in Jerusalem's Church of the Holy Sephila3:58
3 minutes, 58 seconds
onto which Christ's body was laid after the crucifixion to be washed and prepared for burial by painting Christ on this stone. Mantenna is pinning the4:07
4 minutes, 7 seconds
image to an exact moment, not the crucifixion, not the resurrection, but the threshold between them. The brief terrible interval when the body is4:15
4 minutes, 15 seconds
present and the story has not yet resolved. This is not grief. This is the moment before grief finds any direction to move in. The white cloth covering the4:24
4 minutes, 24 seconds
lower body completes the argument. White in the visual language of this period was not the color of death. It was the color of what follows death. The cloth4:32
4 minutes, 32 seconds
that the gospels say was left behind in the empty tomb when Christ rose.4:37
4 minutes, 37 seconds
Mantenna has painted it clinging to the body beneath damp and tight simultaneously more realistic and more strange. A cloth that reveals the shape4:45
4 minutes, 45 seconds
of what it covers is already announcing an absence. And then there is the thing almost no one mentions. The detail buried so deep in the composition that4:53
4 minutes, 53 seconds
five centuries of viewers have consistently looked past it or chosen not to see it. An art historian named Colin Eisler was the first to formally5:01
5 minutes, 1 second
identify where the perspective of this painting actually centers the eye, not on the face, not on the wounds, on Christ's genitals. Another scholar, Lao5:10
5 minutes, 10 seconds
Steinberg, spent decades documenting that this was not an aberration. that Renaissance painters when depicting Christ as an infant or as a dead man5:18
5 minutes, 18 seconds
frequently and deliberately drew attention to his sex. The reason was doctrinal. The argument being made was about the incarnation. The Christian5:26
5 minutes, 26 seconds
belief that God did not take on a symbolic or softened version of a human body, but a complete one. with every biological fact that entails in a period5:35
5 minutes, 35 seconds
when this was a live and serious theological debate centering the composition on Christ's humanity in its most literal sense was a statement of5:43
5 minutes, 43 seconds
faith was born around 1431 the second son of a5:50
5 minutes, 50 seconds
carpenter in a village near Padua by the age of 11 he was no longer living with his family he had been taken in formerly adopted by a man named Francesco5:59
5 minutes, 59 seconds
Squashion a painter of middling talent and extraordinary obsession. Squashion had spent years traveling through Italy and possibly into Greece collecting fragments of Greco Roman antiquity,6:10
6 minutes, 10 seconds
broken sculptures, stone reliefs, carved sarcophagi, architectural pieces,6:14
6 minutes, 14 seconds
plaster casts of classical statues. His studio in Padua in Italian a bautga which simply means an artist's workshop6:22
6 minutes, 22 seconds
was essentially a private museum of the ancient world. He built his entire teaching method around it. His students did not learn to paint from life. They6:30
6 minutes, 30 seconds
learned to read from stone. To understand that every surface of a classical sculpture was a decision, that form and meaning were the same thing,6:37
6 minutes, 37 seconds
that nothing the ancient world made was merely decorative. As many as 137 painters passed through his doors. Many6:44
6 minutes, 44 seconds
absorbed all of it and then sued him. At 17, he walked out and took Squion to court, arguing that his master had extracted years of skilled labor without6:53
6 minutes, 53 seconds
appropriate payment. A court agreed and ruled in his favor. The relationship that had given him everything he knew about art ended in litigation.7:00
7 minutes
Squashion, for his part, retaliated the only way he could. Through criticism, he said publicly that Manten's figures looked like men made of stone and should7:09
7 minutes, 9 seconds
have been painted stone color. He meant it as a devastating insult. He was describing with more accuracy than he intended. Exactly what Mantenna would spend the rest of his career perfecting.7:19
7 minutes, 19 seconds
His figures do look like stone. His drapery folds with the geometry of carved marble rather than the softness of cloth. His flesh is cool and precise.7:28
7 minutes, 28 seconds
He became one of the most celebrated painters in Italy, court painter to the Gonzaga family in Manua, sought after by popes and emperors, eventually kned. He was by every external measure a success.7:39
7 minutes, 39 seconds
He died in debt. His son sold the lamentation to settle what was owed.7:48
7 minutes, 48 seconds
There is a theory not confirmed but persistent that a patron commissioned this painting, saw it and refused it. No7:55
7 minutes, 55 seconds
identified client ever received it. It was found in Manten's studio after his death among his personal possessions which requires explanation. The most8:04
8 minutes, 4 seconds
commonly accepted hypothesis is that it was made for private devotion, possibly intended for aerary chapel in Manua that8:11
8 minutes, 11 seconds
was never completed. But the other possibility has never gone away. That someone saw this painting and sent it back. Because what Mantenna had8:19
8 minutes, 19 seconds
delivered was not what they had asked for. It is easy to understand why. Every other lamentation painting of this period gave the viewer something to hold8:26
8 minutes, 26 seconds
on to. Mourers pressing close to the body. The art historian Hubert Schrade put it plainly about this painting. None of the mourers dare touch the corpse.8:36
8 minutes, 36 seconds
They stand at the edge of the frame weeping. But the body lies entirely alone on its stone, untouchable,8:42
8 minutes, 42 seconds
separated from the living by something that is not just physical distance. The space around the body reads like a morttery. A patron expecting consolation8:50
8 minutes, 50 seconds
would have found instead a confrontation. And still, Montenena kept it. Through the years, when he had to sell objects from his personal collection to cover his debts, and there8:59
8 minutes, 59 seconds
is a specific record of him selling a gem he had owned for years, a piece he valued because the money was needed.9:05
9 minutes, 5 seconds
Through all of that, this painting stayed in his studio. He did not sell it. He did not give it away. He kept it on the wall or leaning against it for9:13
9 minutes, 13 seconds
the last decades of his life. Those feet pointed at him every day he walked in to work. There is an inscription that appeared on medieval images of the9:21
9 minutes, 21 seconds
crucified Christ carved into the stone or painted into the border. In Latin,9:26
9 minutes, 26 seconds
aspis kitransis quaiki dellores. It translates as look here you who are passing by for you are the cause of my9:34
9 minutes, 34 seconds
pain. It is a direct address to the viewer an accusation. It tells whoever is standing in front of the image that Christ's suffering was not abstract not9:43
9 minutes, 43 seconds
historical that it was on their behalf and they are implicated in it. Manten never inscribed those words on the lamentation. He did not need to. The9:51
9 minutes, 51 seconds
painting delivers the same address through composition alone. The feet point at you. The wounds face you. The perspective moves toward you. You are9:59
9 minutes, 59 seconds
not standing in front of this painting as a spectator. You are being spoken to.10:04
10 minutes, 4 seconds
Maybe that is why he kept it. A painting that implicates you is not a comfortable thing to live with. But some images are not made for comfort. Some are made to10:12
10 minutes, 12 seconds
be returned to, looked at, sat with until looking becomes something closer to reckoning. Mantenna spent his entire career making things for other people,10:21
10 minutes, 21 seconds
for churches, for dynasties, for emperors, for god knows who. This one he made for himself and kept for himself and died with it still in the room. The10:30
10 minutes, 30 seconds
lamentation of Christ has been in the pinnacle,10:37
10 minutes, 37 seconds
68x 81 cm, smaller than you expect when you finally stand in front of it. People stand in front of it longer than almost10:45
10 minutes, 45 seconds
any other painting in the museum. Most of them couldn't tell you exactly what they are looking for, but they do not walk away. And I want to leave you with10:53
10 minutes, 53 seconds
one question. This painting disturbed everyone who saw it. A patron likely rejected it. The church never commissioned it. It was too honest, too11:02
11 minutes, 2 seconds
confrontational, too unwilling to make death look like anything other than what it is. Many knew all of this. He lived11:09
11 minutes, 9 seconds
with this painting anyway. So what does it mean when the most honest thing a person ever made is the thing they could never bring themselves to let go of?11:18
11 minutes, 18 seconds
Think about that.
